inducing Cooperation by Reciprocative Strategy in Non - Zero - Sum Games
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper, we investigate the use of reciprocative strategy to induce cooperative behavior in non-zero-sum games. Reciprocative behavior is defined mathematically in the context of a two-person non-zero-sum game in which both the players have a common set of pure strategies. Conditions under which mutual cooperative behavior results when one of the players responds optimally to reciprocative behavior by the other player are described. Also, the desirability of playing the reciprocative strategy is investigated by stating conditions under which reciprocative strategy by one of the players or by both the players leading to mutual cooperative behavior is a Nash equilibrium outcome.
منابع مشابه
A TRANSITION FROM TWO-PERSON ZERO-SUM GAMES TO COOPERATIVE GAMES WITH FUZZY PAYOFFS
In this paper, we deal with games with fuzzy payoffs. We proved that players who are playing a zero-sum game with fuzzy payoffs against Nature are able to increase their joint payoff, and hence their individual payoffs by cooperating. It is shown that, a cooperative game with the fuzzy characteristic function can be constructed via the optimal game values of the zero-sum games with fuzzy payoff...
متن کاملIdentifying and Responding to Cooperative Actions in General-sum Normal Form Games
My primary research interest is social behavior of software agents acting in general-sum normal form games. In an environment with another agent, an agent needs to be able to identify if the opponent is hostile or cooperative by looking at the opponent’s actions, and respond appropriately. If the opponent is hostile, the agent should guard against it. Even for a self-interested agent, cooperati...
متن کاملDecision Theory III - Zero Sum Games
Game theory is a huge area of mathematical (and economical) research. We restrict ourselves mainly to two person zero-sum games, in which you make a decision and your opponent makes a decision (no cooperation allowed!), and your winnings equal your opponents loss. The main result is the so-called minimax theorem. Essentially, game theory is about playing against a (possibly) better player and e...
متن کاملPure strategy Nash equilibria in non-zero sum colonel Blotto games
We analyze a Colonel Blotto game in which opposing parties have di¤ering relative intensities (i.e. the game is non-zero sum). We characterize the colonels payo¤s that sustain a pure strategy equilibrium and present an algorithm that reaches the equilibrium actions (when they exist). Finally we show that the set of games with a pure strategy equilibria is non-empty. JEL Classi cation: C72, D7,...
متن کاملStrategic Decompositions of Normal Form Games: Zero-sum Games and Potential Games
We study new classes of games, called zero-sum equivalent games and zero-sum equivalent potential games, and prove decomposition theorems involving these classes of games. We say that two games are “strategically equivalent” if, for every player, the payoff differences between two strategies (holding other players’ strategies fixed) are identical. A zero-sum equivalent game is a game that is st...
متن کامل